The recent information coming out of the Dartmouth Medical School and "SPORT" or Spine Patient Outcomes Research trial has certainly shed some light on the efficacy of spinal surgery.
Here are some facts from the trial and summations that were made by the head researcher Dr. James Weinstein on his MPR interview.....
- Spinal surgery for disc herniation or disc bulges has short term relief for a small number of patients.
- On the other hand looking at this same group at the two year mark following surgery. The group that underwent surgery is no better off then the non-surgical treatment group. (commonly at the two year mark a high percentage of patients who have had surgery will need another)
- It would appear in certain cases of spinal stenosis that surgery was effective at the two year mark. (we have found that on certain cases that spinal stenosis responds very well to non-surgical spinal decompression)
It is important to understand what is effective and what is not effective when considering invasive low back surgery. I am commonly asked what is the longevity associated with spinal decompression? I have been performing this treatment along with spinal re-strengthening for 4 years now, we were the first clinic to offer treatment with the DRX 9000 in San Diego. I still talk to many of my first patients who continue to live pain free lives! The Southern California Spine Center has a very high success rate treating low back disc bulges and herniation. It has been our experience that the results are long standing. I do qualify patients carefully for care, which appears to be a big difference with my clinic as compared to others. The follow-up re-strengthening is mandatory for long term effects.